As you know, the budget committee of
Did you know that there is still a line item for a Director of Recreation, Natural Resources and Culture?
Why can’t the administration figure out what it wants to do with regards to this department?
Mayor Jackson’s transition team took the position that the city might be best served by reorganizing city government and doing away with the department altogether. This would be accomplished by dividing up the work of that department amongst the remaining departments. It is an idea that has beenfloated here and elsewhere for the past few years.
Last month, the preliminary budget included money for hiring a director of DRNRC and three staff people in seeming conflict with the transition report. Then, in a November 21, 2014 article by Times reporter Jenna Pizzi, city spokesman Michael Walker stated the idea was scrapped.
"The mayor is not moving ahead with the department of recreation," Walker said. "He is rethinking the way the city is moving forward with recreation."
Or so we thought.
Turns out, page three of the budget reviewed at the Monday, December 22 hearing included the line items for salaries of a recreation director's and staff. (See image above). This completely contradicts Walker's statement made last month.
Sources say the administration doesn't know yet how it wishes to proceed with the recreation department but wants the money in place just the same.
Sounds indefinite and undecided. Kind of like the guy who was running things a year ago this month.